Monday, 24 March 2025 »  Login
in
»
Movies » V For Vendetta Movie Review
I am at

V For Vendetta Review

V For Vendetta
Kavita Krishnamoorthy / fullhyd.com
EDITOR RATING
7.5
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
NA
NA
NA
NA
Suggestions
Can watch again
NA
Good for kids
NA
Good for dates
NA
Wait for OTT
NA
A movie by the Wachowski brothers inevitably brings about visions of extremely modern gadgetry and hi-tech computers, with monitors displaying stuff that may as well have been Latin (and perhaps it actually is). Far from it being so, V For Vendetta ends up giving you more of a reality check that you would probably expect from a commercial movie.

Set in the year 2020, the film shows a world that is nothing like what we know of today. But it does mention that the US is extinct, which in itself for several is good enough reason to keep watching the movie.

Getting back on track, the first ten minutes set the tone for the entire movie: the US’ war on terrorism has finally led to its downfall, and all relations between the US and England have broken down. England, in its eagerness to restore the peace, has its government restructured, with Adam Sutler (John Hurt) elected as the High Chancellor.

Now don’t be mistaken - Sutler is no Tony Blair. The casting is perfect, and was done with only one thing in mind: how do we portray a totalitarian, almost fascistic figure, without actually stating the name Hitler? The answer is simple: We get someone who looks just like him. And mind you, there’s absolutely no mistaking the similarities.

Sutler is soon to resign, when there’s a mysterious biological attack in an elementary school in London. By popular demand, Sutler is reinstated indefinitely, and thus begins his reign of terror. Muslims are blamed for the attack, and all non-Christian religions are banned. As a direct result of this, all those deemed “different” are also made victims to this rule, and are secretly abducted and executed.

In the midst of all this, however, there are two survivors. Umm... make that one significant survivor and the other just an audience puller. A man known only as “V”, runs into Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) by chance, saves her from being assaulted, and includes her in his devious plans to blow up the Old Bailey.

She returns the favor the next day, and ends up in his secret hideout. And that about ends her role, even though she’s there in every other frame henceforth. Other than being V’s secretkeeper, there’s no other dimension to Portman's role. She’s a victim at every single stage, and even that could have been portrayed better.

V is the glue that binds all the bits and pieces of the movie together. The very fact that his true identity isn’t revealed throughout the movie is its USP. He is known only by the Guy Fawkes mask that he wears during his trysts with the government.

He hijacks a room in the fictional BTN (England’s futuristic version of the BBC), and broadcasts through the emergency transmission channel to every single house in England, that he will destroy Parliament on November 5, one year from then, to instigate the overthrow of the government. He leaves the citizens of England with a Guy Fawkes quote: "Remember, remember, the fifth of November. The gunpowder treason and plot. For, I see no reason why the gunpowder treason, Should ever be forgot."

Incidentally, Guy Fawkes attempted to destroy Parliament on November 5, 1605 in what's known as "The Gunpowder Treason".

The entire movie has a dark undertone - there are hardly any happy scenes or smiles, or for that matter even daylight. And Natalie Portman gives a new meaning to the word emaciated. Cadavers have more life running through their veins than she does. Sure, her gaunt look is supposed to be an indication of all the adversity she’s been exposed to, but frankly, there’s hardly any difference between her “before” and “after” torture looks.

While V’s primary occupation is his frenzied revenge bulimia, there are many other twists and turns to the story that must be watched in order to be completely appreciated. Right from discourses on frying an egg to secret alliances and hidden political agendas being unravelled, the film traverses a spectrum that warrants a pat on the backs of the Wachowski brothers for pulling off something rational for a change.

While you could visualize V For Vendetta as a modern day (make that very modern day) Rang De Basanti, care has been taken to not portray the world as being conceptually weird, like in the Wachowski’s pet project, The Matrix trilogies. This spellbinding adventure is a prelude to some really hot debates, and is sure to stir the current politically comatose generation into taking a look at what is really happening around them.

V for Vendetta proves one thing: you don’t need computers to make a successful sci-fi movie. And you don’t have to be the guy in A Beautiful Mind to capture the undercurrents of the movie. But be prepared to be intensely intellectually stimulated by the end of it.
Share. Save. Connect.
  EMAIL
  PRINT
  SAVE
V FOR VENDETTA SNAPSHOT
V For Vendetta (english) reviews
USER RATING
8.2
47 USERS
RATE
Rating is quick and easy - try it!
V FOR VENDETTA USER REVIEWS
1 - 9 OF 9 COMMENTS
POSITIVE  |  NEGATIVE |  NEWEST  |  OLDEST  |  MOST HELPFUL  |  LEAST HELPFUL
USER RATING
8.2
47 USERS
Performances
Script
Music/Soundtrack
Visuals
NA
NA
NA
NA
Can watch again - NA
Good for kids - NA
Good for dates - NA
Wait for OTT - NA
Arpan on 18th Jun 2006, 6:18pm | Permalink
Well done... very balanced review... and yes... this movie was wonderful... maybe not a cult movie like the matrix, but definitely more mature and very nicely executed. The Wachowski brothers have grown up...
RATING
8
Vamsi K on 2nd Jun 2006, 12:53pm | Permalink
The Matrix is irrational? Conceptually weird? Kavita, you need to watch the Trilogy again if this is what you think of them.

This concept is one of the most interesting and thought-provoking I've ever seen in a movie. It's not based on a novel, nor is it a remake. It's an intellectual project by the Brothers that shook every movie buff.



"V for Vendetta" has similar overtones - a system that needs to be changed, and a lone guy who sets out to do it. The context is different. But the visualisation is just as rich and the settings just as painstakingly executed. "V" mght not be as grandiose as the Trilogy, but I liked it nonetheless.
RATING
8
Abhishek P C on 28th Apr 2006, 11:31am | Permalink
Rating is for the review....well done review, Kavita.
RATING
10
Zeus on 25th Apr 2006, 11:31am | Permalink
An average movie. Storyline isn't very impressive, and so is the climax.
RATING
4
Occasional Critic on 11th Apr 2006, 3:21pm | Permalink
If you walk into the theatre hoping to see the same flash and kinetic energy as the first matrix picture, you are bound to be disappointed. V for Vendetta is bland as cornstarch and is mediocre at best.
RATING
6
Rahul on 8th Apr 2006, 9:30pm | Permalink
Movie is absolutely amazing... it is leagues ahead of its game, much like Dr. Strangelove was during its release... Special FX should not be discussed with any Hollywood movie - it is expected to be perfect, and this movie was no different. But the story, and the SCRIPT was truly worth every ruppee you spend on the movie. Go watch it on Big Screen...
RATING
8
Aamchi Hyd on 6th Apr 2006, 4:03pm | Permalink
Someone bring Priyanka Pulla back! The movie is a crock of shit. The graphic novel father of this work, Alan Moore, has rightly distanced himself from this, prompting Warners to pay all the reviewers of this lame-excuse of a movie to give good reviews. Wachowski brothers lost it a long time back, with Matrix reloaded, and V doesn't inspire that they have made amends. If anything, they have sunk further into a mire of their own making. This is an insult to the sci-fi, adventure as well as the comic genre. The makers should go watch the Spiderman movies, Zorro 1, Indiana Jones movies and Dark city before they embark on any sequel. As for Natalie, she did better in Star Wars 3 and Closer.
RATING
2
Aishwarya on 6th Apr 2006, 12:26am | Permalink
The rating was for the review. I think it is very informative. Well done Kavitha. The review of the movie follows!
RATING
8
Vivek Vivek on 5th Apr 2006, 10:13am | Permalink
Awesome review for an very difficult to review movie, i must say.
RATING
8
LEAVE A COMMENT
fullhyd.com has 700,000+ monthly visits. Tell Hyderabad what you feel about V For Vendetta!
Rate Movie
[no link to your name will appear, overriding global settings]
To preserve integrity, fullhyd.com allows ratings/comments only with a valid email. Your comments will be accepted once you give your email, and will be deleted if the email is not authenticated within 24 hours.
My name:

Dissatisfied with the results? Report a problem or error, or add a listing.
ADVERTISEMENT
SHOUTBOX!
{{todo.name}}
{{todo.date}}
[
]
{{ todo.summary }}... expand »
{{ todo.text }} « collapse
First  |  Prev  |   1   2  3  {{current_page-1}}  {{current_page}}  {{current_page+1}}  {{last_page-2}}  {{last_page-1}}  {{last_page}}   |  Next  |  Last
{{todos[0].name}}

{{todos[0].text}}

ADVERTISEMENT
This page was tagged for
https://movies.fullhyderabad.com/v-for-vendetta/english/v-for-vendetta-movie-reviews-1678-2.html
V For Vendetta english movie
V For Vendetta reviews
release date
Natalie Portman, Hugo Weaving
Follow fullhyd.com on
Copyright © 2023 LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. fullhyd and fullhyderabad are registered trademarks of LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material in this site is protected by copyright law. You may not copy, distribute or use this material except as necessary for your personal, non-commercial use. Any trademarks are the properties of their respective owners.